Female, anti feminist, egalitarian.
I'm against sexism of all kinds but there are plenty of blogs whose sole focus is on women but very few even recognise that sexism does not equal Man against Woman.
This blog focuses on Misandry: The hatred, discimination or distrust of men and boys. Pointing out the representation of men in the media, deliberate misinformation/misrepresentation, the demonisation of men in our society and the imbalance this causes.
Rather than think of ourselves as in competition we should cater to everyone as needed.
If you think I'm being unfair to other women just know that I consider all sides of an argument, normally I prefer to be the fence. But for the purposes of this blog I have taken a side so apologies if this offends you.
I answer all asks privately unless otherwise requested or anonymous.

 

poorpoorpitifulme said: Who wouldn’t with justicar though…

Absolutely. My sister said she would have a sex change just for a chance. And he’s only 5’4” which makes him even more adorablehot.

poorpoorpitifulme said: To be fair, the two are not necessarily contradictory as different cultures can have different attitudes and so two different cultures could, potentially, both be misogynistic but one express that with homophobia and one with homosexuality.

How would hatred of gay men even be misogyny in any way though? That’s what I don’t understand. Especially in societies that fiercely protected women, if they considered gay men to be women, why beat and murder them? Also, while male homosexuality was made illegal in the 1800s, female homosexuality has never been illegal in this country, not sure about others but I wouldn’t be surprised.

Also, I meant that I’d seen the same feminists, on the same culture, often even in the same bloody comment, claim that men in ancient times shunned homosexual relationships because misogyny then go on to say that they had relationships with men because misogyny. Something along the lines of: “Ancient societies hated gay men because they took on the female role of being dominated by a man but they hated women so much they would rather fuck each other than any woman”. The anti-porn feminists often use the same “logic” when talking about how gay porn is also hatred, objectification and rape of women because the man on the receiving end represents a woman and that the very essence of femininity is violated in the act.

Now they’re talking about the Sacred Band of Thebes, a highly efficient army of 150 homosexual male couples who fought fiercely alongside each other. And Socrates/Alcibiades.

I love watching feminists battling their doublethink. I’ve seen feminists on history articles or posts on here constantly switching between “men didn’t have sex with other men because they hated women” and “men had sex with other men because they hated women”. Homophobia is part of the patriarchy! Ancient Greek men shagged other men because they hated women!

You know you always see feminists claiming that homophobia is part of the ~patriarchy~ and is technically misogyny and that masculinity is so fragile that men can’t show any kind of affection towards each other lest they be seen as women? Despite the fact that men had always been openly affectionate with each other until mass hysteria over homosexuality and the extreme punishments resulted in the aloofness we have today.

So we always get feminists saying that homophobia is a male construct, that it is just the fear that gay men will treat them how they treat women. I’m just listening to a hangout with three straight guys in their 30s all talking about how they’d all give it a go, try anything once. Particularly with Justicar.

zgeek:


Roald Dahl NOT an Aldi favourite

The supermarket chain Aldi has withdrawn Roald Dahl’s classic children’s book Revolting Rhymes from its Australian stores following a complaint on its Facebook page.
An Aldi spokeswoman said the book had been pulled after “comments by a limited number of concerned customers regarding the language used in this particular book”. Other books by the legendary British children’s author will continue to be stocked, she said.
“Aldi Australia would like to inform all of our customers that we take the concerns from the community seriously,” she said.
“Poor Cindy’s heart was torn to shreds. My Prince! she thought. He chops off heads! How could I marry anyone who does that sort of thing for fun? The Prince cried, ‘Who’s this dirty slut? Off with her nut! Off with her nut!’”
Source


New Post has been published on http://www.zgeek.com/roald-dahl-not-an-aldi-favourite/

Loved this book as a kid, used to watch the animated version on video. Even when I was 6 I recognised that it was a pisstake of the prim and proper, twee cheesefest of the traditional fairy tales. I mean my god have you read them?
Goldilocks and the three Bears:

But Goldilocks, like many freaks, does not appreciate antiques. She doesn’t care, she doesn’t mind and now she plonks her fat behind upon this dainty, precious chair and CRACK it busts beyond repair.
A nice girl would at once exclaim “Oh dear, oh heavens, what a shame”. Not Goldie, she begins to swear, she bellows: “What a lousy chair” and uses one disgusting word that luckily you’ve never heard. I dare not write it, even hint it, nobody would ever print it.


Little Red Riding Hood:

The small girl smiles, one eyelid flickers, she whips a pistol from her knickers, she aims it at the creatures head and bang bang bang she shoots him dead.
A few weeks later in the wood, a came across miss Riding Hood. But what a change, no cloak of red, no silly hood upon her head. She said “hello” and “do please note, my lovely, furry wolfskin coat”.

Three Little Pigs:

Once more the maiden’s eyelid flickers, she draws the pistol from her knickers, once more she hits the vital spot and kills him with a single shot. Pig, peeping through the window, stood and yelled “Well done miss Riding Hood!”.
Ah piglet, you must never trust young ladies from the upper crust. For now miss Riding Hood, one notes, not only has two wolfskin coats but when she goes from place to place she has a pigskin travelling case.

Jack and the Beanstalk:

She snatched the bean, she yelled “You chump!” and flung on the rubbish dump. Then summoning up all her power, she beat the boy for half an hour. Using, and nothing could be meaner, the handle of a vacuum cleaner.

And the aforementioned Cinderella.
I think it’s pretty obvious that these are not exactly Aesop’s fables.
Found them on youtube, links in titles. I can think of no better reason to watch them XD.

zgeek:

Roald Dahl NOT an Aldi favourite

The supermarket chain Aldi has withdrawn Roald Dahl’s classic children’s book Revolting Rhymes from its Australian stores following a complaint on its Facebook page.

An Aldi spokeswoman said the book had been pulled after “comments by a limited number of concerned customers regarding the language used in this particular book”. Other books by the legendary British children’s author will continue to be stocked, she said.

“Aldi Australia would like to inform all of our customers that we take the concerns from the community seriously,” she said.

“Poor Cindy’s heart was torn to shreds. My Prince! she thought. He chops off heads! How could I marry anyone who does that sort of thing for fun? The Prince cried, ‘Who’s this dirty slut? Off with her nut! Off with her nut!’”

Source

New Post has been published on http://www.zgeek.com/roald-dahl-not-an-aldi-favourite/

Loved this book as a kid, used to watch the animated version on video. Even when I was 6 I recognised that it was a pisstake of the prim and proper, twee cheesefest of the traditional fairy tales. I mean my god have you read them?

Goldilocks and the three Bears:

But Goldilocks, like many freaks, does not appreciate antiques. She doesn’t care, she doesn’t mind and now she plonks her fat behind upon this dainty, precious chair and CRACK it busts beyond repair.

A nice girl would at once exclaim “Oh dear, oh heavens, what a shame”. Not Goldie, she begins to swear, she bellows: “What a lousy chair” and uses one disgusting word that luckily you’ve never heard. I dare not write it, even hint it, nobody would ever print it.

Little Red Riding Hood:

The small girl smiles, one eyelid flickers, she whips a pistol from her knickers, she aims it at the creatures head and bang bang bang she shoots him dead.

A few weeks later in the wood, a came across miss Riding Hood. But what a change, no cloak of red, no silly hood upon her head. She said “hello” and “do please note, my lovely, furry wolfskin coat”.

Three Little Pigs:

Once more the maiden’s eyelid flickers, she draws the pistol from her knickers, once more she hits the vital spot and kills him with a single shot. Pig, peeping through the window, stood and yelled “Well done miss Riding Hood!”.

Ah piglet, you must never trust young ladies from the upper crust. For now miss Riding Hood, one notes, not only has two wolfskin coats but when she goes from place to place she has a pigskin travelling case.

Jack and the Beanstalk:

She snatched the bean, she yelled “You chump!” and flung on the rubbish dump. Then summoning up all her power, she beat the boy for half an hour. Using, and nothing could be meaner, the handle of a vacuum cleaner.

And the aforementioned Cinderella.

I think it’s pretty obvious that these are not exactly Aesop’s fables.

Found them on youtube, links in titles. I can think of no better reason to watch them XD.

Dem Bitches Be Crazy - Feminism LOL

Going through chapter 4 of Elizabeth Sheehy’s “Defending Battered Women on Trial”. She’s the law professor who is trying to make it legal for women to kill their male partners if they claim abuse even, as demonstrated by this chapter, if she is the abusive one.

The woman in this case was even known to be extremely violent as testified by all the witnesses, she would beat him in public, persisting until he eventually snapped and fought back. He would have scratches and bruises all over his body from head to toe while she would have bruises from her own drunken clumsiness and his self defence. Despite many witnesses saying she screaming that she was going to kill him, when she actually killed him, she claimed self defence, saying he loaded the gun, gave it to her and told her to shoot him, which she did. Then claimed she thought it was unloaded despite saying she watched him load it and claiming she was defending herself despite saying she didn’t think it was loaded. She, of course, got away with it.

Three months prior to this, another woman got away with murder saying her partner ordered her to shoot him, contradicting all witness accounts. Sheehy even points this out. As well as arguing that the abuse of the man misrepresents battering as being equally available to women and that the idea of men being DV victims is “preposterous”.

ferventfox:

tosaveoursouls:

ferventfox:

tosaveoursouls:

claimingmylife:

it-goes-both-ways:

captaindrprofessorsupermcawesome:

LOOK AT HOW WELL THIS IS SOURCED

That aside I need to double check this because I can almost guarentee this is a statistic that has been taken out of context and spun, I WILL REPORT BACK WITH THE NEWS

Also twice the non reciprocal means that women fight back to their abusers and men don’t

It doesn’t mean that women are committing twice the amount of harm

Here, have 286 sources. Happy now?

No? Have 1700 then.

I just can’t bravo

I don’t mean to be insensitive here. But has anyone thought MAYBE the rates are higher because BASICALLY MOST assaults to female go unreported?

You honestly think men report domestic abuse more than women? 

I think there’s more men in this world that would say “this bitch is craaaazy” and report, than women that feel confident enough to stand up for themselves, yes.
I didn’t mean for my comments to come across as a “whoa is us women, we need attention” just stating an opinion/thought.

Then I think you have a very warped view of the situation. For one thing a lot of men say stuff like “bitch is crazy” to flippantly refer to their abuse without admitting it was abuse. People who say stuff like that don’t report. More importantly: Men who call for help in domestic violence situations frequently get arrested. Not to mention that there are basically no resources for abused men. There are practically no shelters, little opportunity for legal recourse and protection, and if there are children involved—good luck getting them out of that household or ever even seeing them again.  This is the kind of shit that happens when men call so much as a  domestic abuse hotline; you really think men are going to be willing to go to the actual authorities? So if you’re going to say something that defies basically everything I know about male ipv victims, I’m gonna need some cold hard facts that say women are less likely to report. 

flclgur:

it-goes-both-ways:

tosaveoursouls:

claimingmylife:

it-goes-both-ways:

captaindrprofessorsupermcawesome:

LOOK AT HOW WELL THIS IS SOURCED

That aside I need to double check this because I can almost guarentee this is a statistic that has been taken out of context and spun, I WILL REPORT BACK WITH THE NEWS

Also twice the non reciprocal means that women fight back to their abusers and men don’t

It doesn’t mean that women are committing twice the amount of harm

Here, have 286 sources. Happy now?

No? Have 1700 then.

I just can’t bravo

I don’t mean to be insensitive here. But has anyone thought MAYBE the rates are higher because BASICALLY MOST assaults to female go unreported?

How can you possibly have even the slightest inkling of how many crimes go unreported? Why be so disappointed that you have to imagine masses of women being secretly beaten and abused when you see stats like this? If it showed the opposite you’d be lapping it up, or even saying that the number female victims are still not high enough.

This is what real Feminism is about. It’s not about oppressing men to make them feel what women have felt. It’s about not making men feel weak or like a “pussy” by saying that he was beat by abusive female counterpart. It’s about letting men practically don the role of women and not making them feel ashamed.

Either way, abuse victims will often feel like they deserve what they got or that they did something to provoke their spouse. In a fair world abuse victims would never be afraid to speak up.

Being abused is the role of women? Men being abused is not at all new, historically they would be paraded around the town while everyone threw things, jeered and banged pots and pans. While abusive men were punished severely as well. Men were punished either way whoever did the hitting.

What feminism has done is make women only shelters, ban men from the premises, ban male children, heighten paranoia and fear, define bullshit such as “using logic” and “refusing to have sex with her” as domestic violence, protest men’s shelters, come up with hateful laws like VAWA and enforce the entirely inaccurate Duluth model and ensure that men are the ones arrested even when they call about an abusive woman. Feminism has never done a damned thing to help men.

Town where entire population is made up of beautiful young women makes appeal for single men

orange-soda-conspiracy:

it-goes-both-ways:

A town where the entire population is made up of young women has made an appeal for single men - but only those willing to live by female rules.

Over 600 women make up the population of Noiva do Cordeiro, southeast Brazil - most aged between 20 and 35.

Although some are married with families, their husbands are made to work away from home, only being allowed to return at weekends.

Sons are sent away when they reach 18 and no other men are permitted to live in the town, which sits in a remote valley 60 miles east of Belo Horizonte.

The settlement dates back to the 1890s, when a young woman and her family were excommunicated from the Catholic church after she was accused of adultery.

Slowly more single women and mother-only families joined the community, and over the decades several attempts by men to intervere in their way of life made them adopt a strictly ‘no male’ policy.

Today, girl power rules in the rural town, with women in charge of every aspect of life - from farming to town planning and even religion.

But while none of the residents of Noiva do Cordeiro would have it any other way, it has left them with just one problem.

One of the women, Nelma Fernandes, 23, admits it’s impossible for the girls - renowned in the region as strikingly beautiful - to find a would-be spouse.

She said: “Here, the only men we single girls meet are either married or related to us, everyone is a cousin. I haven’t kissed a man for a long time.

"We all dream of falling in love and getting married. But we like living here and don’t want to have to leave the town to find a husband.

The lack of eligible batchelors has now led the community’s many single young ladies for make an appeal for interested men - but only those willing to adapt to living in a women’s world.

Ms Fernandes said: “We’d like to get to know men who would leave their own lives and come to be a part of ours.

"But first they need to agree to do what we say and live according to our rules."

Picturesque Noiva do Cordeiro grew up in the rolling hills near Belo Vale, in Minas Gerais state, after founder Maria Senhorinha de Lima was branded an adulterer after leaving a man she had been forced to marry.

She was chased out of town in 1891 after the Catholic church excommunicated her and the next five generations of her family. 

Shunned by the local population, she and other women who subsequently went to live with them were vilified as loose women and prostitutes, causing them to isolate themselves from the outside world.

In 1940, an evangelical pastor, Anisio Pereira, took one of the women, aged 16, to be his wife and founded a church in the growing community.

However, he proceeded to impose strict puritanical rules, banning them from drinking alcohol, listening to music, cutting their hair or using any type of contraceptive.

When Anisio died in 1995, the women decided never again to let a man dictate how they should live.

One of the first things they did was to dismantle the male-biased organised religion he had set up.

Another woman, Rosalee Fernandes, 49, said: “We have God in our hearts. But we don’t think we need to go to church, get married in front of a priest or baptise our children. These are rules made up by men.”

It is not the only part of life in the town which has been given a uniquely feminine touch.

Ms Fernandes said: “There are lots of things that women do better than men. Our town is prettier, more organised, and far more harmonious than if men were in charge.

"When problems or disputes arise, we resolve them in a woman’s way, trying to find consensus rather than conflict.

"We share everything, even the land we work on. Nobody competes with anyone here. It’s all for one, and one for all.

"The whole town came together recently to help buy a huge widescreen TV for our community centre so we can all watch soap operas together.

"And there’s always time to stop and gossip, try on each other’s clothes and do each other’s hair and nails."

Sounds torturous.

Drop everything, abandon your lives, live ours and do everything we say. And exile your sons once they reach raping age. It’s wrong for one man to tell us how to live so we’ll force any males to live and do as we say. It’s wrong for one man to tell us what we can’t enjoy so we won’t allow competition of any kind. It’s wrong for one man to think himself superior to us, women are superior. It’s wrong for one man to set restrictive rules for us to live by so we’ll control every single aspect of the life of any male we tolerate.

And they say a matriarchy would be better than a patriarchy. Strange how in a patriarchal society, the protection of women is paramount, men are sent off to die in wars they have no choice in, men take on dangerous and unpleasant jobs to take care of their families, women can strip a man of everything he owns and holds dear including his children and just to really rub it in, falsely accuse him of rape and abuse to get him sent to prison.

Yet they see this as hatred of women and worship of men. Once again, they respond to perceived hatred with genuine hatred. This entire society is like an abusive relationship, controlling, restrictive, belittling and scornful. Not every woman likes gossip, soaps and telling people how to live. Many would also be pretty damned bored by being unable to compete in any way. If they don’t like any kind of maleness why have any men at all.

You forgot the bit where they say “come be a part of our family” yet they also expect men to only be a part of the town and see their children two out of seven days a week at best.

They literally see men as nothing but mobile sperm banks…

Oh well at least the movie version was amusing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhYmfcRJAtc

Oddly enough that was the exact film that sprung to mind when I read this as well.

Wonder if they keep bees.

Town where entire population is made up of beautiful young women makes appeal for single men

A town where the entire population is made up of young women has made an appeal for single men - but only those willing to live by female rules.

Over 600 women make up the population of Noiva do Cordeiro, southeast Brazil - most aged between 20 and 35.

Although some are married with families, their husbands are made to work away from home, only being allowed to return at weekends.

Sons are sent away when they reach 18 and no other men are permitted to live in the town, which sits in a remote valley 60 miles east of Belo Horizonte.

The settlement dates back to the 1890s, when a young woman and her family were excommunicated from the Catholic church after she was accused of adultery.

Slowly more single women and mother-only families joined the community, and over the decades several attempts by men to intervere in their way of life made them adopt a strictly ‘no male’ policy.

Today, girl power rules in the rural town, with women in charge of every aspect of life - from farming to town planning and even religion.

But while none of the residents of Noiva do Cordeiro would have it any other way, it has left them with just one problem.

One of the women, Nelma Fernandes, 23, admits it’s impossible for the girls - renowned in the region as strikingly beautiful - to find a would-be spouse.

She said: “Here, the only men we single girls meet are either married or related to us, everyone is a cousin. I haven’t kissed a man for a long time.

"We all dream of falling in love and getting married. But we like living here and don’t want to have to leave the town to find a husband.

The lack of eligible batchelors has now led the community’s many single young ladies for make an appeal for interested men - but only those willing to adapt to living in a women’s world.

Ms Fernandes said: “We’d like to get to know men who would leave their own lives and come to be a part of ours.

"But first they need to agree to do what we say and live according to our rules."

Picturesque Noiva do Cordeiro grew up in the rolling hills near Belo Vale, in Minas Gerais state, after founder Maria Senhorinha de Lima was branded an adulterer after leaving a man she had been forced to marry.

She was chased out of town in 1891 after the Catholic church excommunicated her and the next five generations of her family. 

Shunned by the local population, she and other women who subsequently went to live with them were vilified as loose women and prostitutes, causing them to isolate themselves from the outside world.

In 1940, an evangelical pastor, Anisio Pereira, took one of the women, aged 16, to be his wife and founded a church in the growing community.

However, he proceeded to impose strict puritanical rules, banning them from drinking alcohol, listening to music, cutting their hair or using any type of contraceptive.

When Anisio died in 1995, the women decided never again to let a man dictate how they should live.

One of the first things they did was to dismantle the male-biased organised religion he had set up.

Another woman, Rosalee Fernandes, 49, said: “We have God in our hearts. But we don’t think we need to go to church, get married in front of a priest or baptise our children. These are rules made up by men.”

It is not the only part of life in the town which has been given a uniquely feminine touch.

Ms Fernandes said: “There are lots of things that women do better than men. Our town is prettier, more organised, and far more harmonious than if men were in charge.

"When problems or disputes arise, we resolve them in a woman’s way, trying to find consensus rather than conflict.

"We share everything, even the land we work on. Nobody competes with anyone here. It’s all for one, and one for all.

"The whole town came together recently to help buy a huge widescreen TV for our community centre so we can all watch soap operas together.

"And there’s always time to stop and gossip, try on each other’s clothes and do each other’s hair and nails."

Sounds torturous.

Drop everything, abandon your lives, live ours and do everything we say. And exile your sons once they reach raping age. It’s wrong for one man to tell us how to live so we’ll force any males to live and do as we say. It’s wrong for one man to tell us what we can’t enjoy so we won’t allow competition of any kind. It’s wrong for one man to think himself superior to us, women are superior. It’s wrong for one man to set restrictive rules for us to live by so we’ll control every single aspect of the life of any male we tolerate.

And they say a matriarchy would be better than a patriarchy. Strange how in a patriarchal society, the protection of women is paramount, men are sent off to die in wars they have no choice in, men take on dangerous and unpleasant jobs to take care of their families, women can strip a man of everything he owns and holds dear including his children and just to really rub it in, falsely accuse him of rape and abuse to get him sent to prison.

Yet they see this as hatred of women and worship of men. Once again, they respond to perceived hatred with genuine hatred. This entire society is like an abusive relationship, controlling, restrictive, belittling and scornful. Not every woman likes gossip, soaps and telling people how to live. Many would also be pretty damned bored by being unable to compete in any way. If they don’t like any kind of maleness why have any men at all.

tosaveoursouls:

claimingmylife:

it-goes-both-ways:

captaindrprofessorsupermcawesome:

LOOK AT HOW WELL THIS IS SOURCED

That aside I need to double check this because I can almost guarentee this is a statistic that has been taken out of context and spun, I WILL REPORT BACK WITH THE NEWS

Also twice the non reciprocal means that women fight back to their abusers and men don’t

It doesn’t mean that women are committing twice the amount of harm

Here, have 286 sources. Happy now?

No? Have 1700 then.

I just can’t bravo

I don’t mean to be insensitive here. But has anyone thought MAYBE the rates are higher because BASICALLY MOST assaults to female go unreported?

How can you possibly have even the slightest inkling of how many crimes go unreported? Why be so disappointed that you have to imagine masses of women being secretly beaten and abused when you see stats like this? If it showed the opposite you’d be lapping it up, or even saying that the number female victims are still not high enough.

angelussatani:

Intuitively this makes sense, but people really need to start sourcing these kinds if infographics. We need to start holding each other to a higher standard of evidence.

Luckily someone’s listed 78 of them.

(Source: honeybadgerbrigade.com)

goinglightsandsirens:

it-goes-both-ways:

goinglightsandsirens:

my dash keeps suggesting i follow this stupid ass blog?

it goes both ways. go shove your own fist up your ass.

p.s” men choose the highest paid specialization” bitch please.

Why would I want to do that?

Do you believe men have no volition? Or that women are too stupid and weak to make their own decisions? You lot are quite willing to believe in gender differences when (erroneously) saying that nearly all abuse and rape is man on woman, willing to exclude men from daycare jobs because people think they will rape the babies, but you can’t even comprehend the idea that men and women might just generally prefer different careers overall.

Why is it you lot associate anything women do with weakness or inferiority? That says more about you than me.

Also, sources.

yes, by my saying that you suggesting that it’s women’s own fault for not getting paid for doing the same work, what I am saying is that men are child predators and women can’t rape and would never ever work in child care.

I would love to address each of these but to be quite honest, I’m not completely sure how you made any of those outrageous bounds. I can’t even make sense of what your point was. like where was the argument?

this is literally what happened.

"there is no such thing as a wage gap. women just never work in higher paying positions"

"this is fucking dumb"

"what so men rape babies?

Actually you told me to fist myself, the word “dumb” never came up.

Men tend to choose jobs with a high mortality rate, those pay more. The highest paying jobs tend to be the most dangerous and unpleasant. CEOs and the like are more to do with the company itself, if they make millions they’ll get paid millions, genitals are irrelevant. If you believe women are forced into lower paying jobs out of hatred, why would men be discouraged out of those jobs by women using fear as a weapon? Why would that happen if it was men forcing women into those jobs? There are efforts to make mostly male jobs at least half female, there are also efforts to keep men out of mostly female jobs.

Generally, men and women choose different jobs, there are exceptions, I am one of them, but when I was in college I saw many women get bored and drop out because they didn’t really like it. That’s not to say they weren’t any good, just that they had no interest, it wasn’t what they expected. There was no discouragement from anyone. I am disagreeing with the idea that people are forced into careers out of hatred of women, or that they are paid less because vagina.

(Source: honeybadgerbrigade.com)

goinglightsandsirens:

my dash keeps suggesting i follow this stupid ass blog?

it goes both ways. go shove your own fist up your ass.

p.s” men choose the highest paid specialization” bitch please.

Why would I want to do that?

Do you believe men have no volition? Or that women are too stupid and weak to make their own decisions? You lot are quite willing to believe in gender differences when (erroneously) saying that nearly all abuse and rape is man on woman, willing to exclude men from daycare jobs because people think they will rape the babies, but you can’t even comprehend the idea that men and women might just generally prefer different careers overall.

Why is it you lot associate anything women do with weakness or inferiority? That says more about you than me.

Also, sources.

(Source: honeybadgerbrigade.com)

Best event yet XD had a massive turnout, our IC Don chose some new songs for us to play, from the Assassin’s Creed Black Flag in-game soundtrack. Favourite being Health to the Company, gorgeous tune.

Great but brief battle, probably around 1500 or so people on the battlefield. Finally put my bow license to use, only missed my shot twice. Accidentally shot a guy in the eye though, ducked down at just the wrong moment, asked if he was all right then got back to fighting. Got congratulated on the shot XD

Even met a guy who identifies as a feminist but is actually not a twat about it. Though he believes in ~patriarchy~, had quite a long and actually not unpleasant discussion with him on the first night, I posited that a system which screws over or slaughters hundreds of thousands of times more men than it helps is not much of a phallocracy, only less concise. I obviously nitpicked about the “fem” part and quote powerful feminists and laws they’ve made. He said it wasn’t “his” feminism and it’s unique to each person, true enough but why adopt a meaningless label. The next day we were breaking up firewood with a sledgehammer together before time in and he helped us take down our burgundian tent and pack up the van in pouring rain, he even asked if I’ll be at the May event next year. So refreshing to be able to debate such things, actually enjoy it, and still get on and work together.