Female, anti feminist, egalitarian.
I'm against sexism of all kinds but there are plenty of blogs whose sole focus is on women but very few even recognise that sexism does not equal Man against Woman.
This blog focuses on Misandry: The hatred, discimination or distrust of men and boys. Pointing out the representation of men in the media, deliberate misinformation/misrepresentation, the demonisation of men in our society and the imbalance this causes.
Rather than think of ourselves as in competition we should cater to everyone as needed.
If you think I'm being unfair to other women just know that I consider all sides of an argument, normally I prefer to be the fence. But for the purposes of this blog I have taken a side so apologies if this offends you.
I answer all asks privately unless otherwise requested or anonymous.

 

IR: Women’s Prison, Rapey Lady Lawyer and a Convenient Assault - Paul Elam

hominishostilis:

awitchinamuggleworld:

freegayconservative:

fuck-liberal-morons:

conservanerdy:

Well, let’s have a 21 year old woman explain it:
-Rape is not regretting a one night stand.-Rape is not when you change your mind afterwards.-Rape is not when a “creepy” guy tries to talk to you.-Rape doesn’t happen to just women, nor is it committed by just men.-Claiming a false rape for whatever reason is a crime and only makes matters worse for actual rape victims.
Rape is when one person forces another person to perform or engage in sexual acts, regardless of gender.

^^ yep…. and most old grey haired men with a $2 haircut can understand those simple concepts…

Wow. people these days.

Because I see these posts so often let me link you to some facts. These are some things that are far more likely to happen to you than being falsely accused of rape.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/charlesclymer/5-things-more-likely-to-happen-to-you-than-being-f-fmeu?s=mobile

>buzzfeed
Look up ‘the innocence project’,
Then sit down.
People have been killed because of false rape charges. People have been beaten an inch from death because of false rape charges. REAL rape victims have been dismissed because of false rape charges.
Shut up.

hominishostilis:

awitchinamuggleworld:

freegayconservative:

fuck-liberal-morons:

conservanerdy:

Well, let’s have a 21 year old woman explain it:

-Rape is not regretting a one night stand.
-Rape is not when you change your mind afterwards.
-Rape is not when a “creepy” guy tries to talk to you.
-Rape doesn’t happen to just women, nor is it committed by just men.
-Claiming a false rape for whatever reason is a crime and only makes matters worse for actual rape victims.

Rape is when one person forces another person to perform or engage in sexual acts, regardless of gender.

^^ yep…. and most old grey haired men with a $2 haircut can understand those simple concepts…

Wow. people these days.

Because I see these posts so often let me link you to some facts. These are some things that are far more likely to happen to you than being falsely accused of rape.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/charlesclymer/5-things-more-likely-to-happen-to-you-than-being-f-fmeu?s=mobile

>buzzfeed

Look up ‘the innocence project’,

Then sit down.

People have been killed because of false rape charges.
People have been beaten an inch from death because of false rape charges.
REAL rape victims have been dismissed because of false rape charges.

Shut up.

(Source: safercampus)

logicd:

This woman tried to discuss the double standard of feminism and give a discourse of “Rape Culture” and was interrupted by feminists. This is not the first time these people have interrupted  people attempting to discuss mens rights and the double standards and hypocrisy of feminists.

Another video where the news interviews her:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Yg-f7fC0Uw

She has given other talks lasting an hour or more to these people in other areas, and while they did not tun to this, they were still interruptions and laughter when she talked and stupid snarky questions and remarks and general disrespect you would give to a guest speaker.

imminentdeathsyndrome:

conservanerdy:

Well, let’s have a 21 year old woman explain it:
-Rape is not regretting a one night stand.-Rape is not when you change your mind afterwards.-Rape is not when a “creepy” guy tries to talk to you.-Rape doesn’t happen to just women, nor is it committed by just men.-Claiming a false rape for whatever reason is a crime and only makes matters worse for actual rape victims.
Rape is when one person forces another person to perform or engage in sexual acts, regardless of gender.

What if that grey-faced man with a $2 haircut was raped repeatedly in prison? Can he then tell you what rape is, or will you dismiss him based on his appearance? What about the 8 year-old boy that was repeatedly raped by an adult female 50 times? Can he tell you what rape is, or will you also dismiss him because he has a penis and therefore doesn’t know what rape is because after all, men can’t be raped.

imminentdeathsyndrome:

conservanerdy:

Well, let’s have a 21 year old woman explain it:

-Rape is not regretting a one night stand.
-Rape is not when you change your mind afterwards.
-Rape is not when a “creepy” guy tries to talk to you.
-Rape doesn’t happen to just women, nor is it committed by just men.
-Claiming a false rape for whatever reason is a crime and only makes matters worse for actual rape victims.

Rape is when one person forces another person to perform or engage in sexual acts, regardless of gender.

What if that grey-faced man with a $2 haircut was raped repeatedly in prison? Can he then tell you what rape is, or will you dismiss him based on his appearance? What about the 8 year-old boy that was repeatedly raped by an adult female 50 times? Can he tell you what rape is, or will you also dismiss him because he has a penis and therefore doesn’t know what rape is because after all, men can’t be raped.

(Source: safercampus)

Prostate Cancer Photoshoot, and the Predictable Reactions to it

dontneedfeminism:

I just recently discovered this facebook post. Depicted is a naked Adam Levine, the lead singer of Maroon 5, with his penis covered only by the hands of his girlfriend. The picture was part of the “Everyman” campaign, which was meant to raise awareness for testicular and prostate cancer.

If we go to the comments, we see that there’s been a great deal of controversy. Over what, you might ask? Well, apparently, some of the comments seem to believe that it’s a bad sign that Adam’s genitals can be covered with only one hand.

Obviously these people don’t seem to understand the fact that every set of genitals is different. Those of us who happen to have penises do not always have them hanging down our pant leg at all times. The difference can basically be summed up in two words: “growers” and “showers”.

Now, I’ve often heard that the reason breast cancer gets so much more funding is due to the objectification of women’s bodies in the process. But here we have a pretty blatant example of the same thing being done for prostate cancer. Yet there’s no increase in funding.

And yet, we all know that if this had been a woman posing for a breast cancer campaign, and somebody had commented that the person’s “tits must be small to only need one hand to cover em”, there would’ve been outrage. Hell, Feminists might’ve gotten whoever said it fired if they caught wind of it.

But this? Apparently not. I didn’t even know this had happened until today. And this was posted almost a year ago.

arhenadoeslife:

it-goes-both-ways:

image

patchoulol replied to your post: One interesting thing I’ve noticed abo…

What gets me is the paradox of thinking men and women are equally strong and capable but women have it harder than men and standards should lower. It’s not that women can’t be as strong as men, it’s just that the arguments combined make no sense.

Women need more protections for abuse because men do more damage but women are just as strong as men but when men are abused it’s not as bad because men not being allowed to deal with it is ~patriarchy~ so we’re going to deal with only women because men are discouraged from seeking help that we have the monopoly on but are not going to provide while men not dealing with it is still ~patriarchy~ and their own fault even though we’re not going to help but we’re for men too by blaming them for all that women suffer…

How their head’s don’t explode I don’t know.

It’s this idea that everything is socially constructed.  That women being weaker as a gender is socially constructed.  That women needing to be protected is a socially constructed myth.  But then if that’s the case then why is it that women need all these special systems that men (according to society) don’t need, if we’re all of the same strength and capabilities?

I know one of Anita Sarkeesian’s favorite terms is “Socially Constructed” but what she doesn’t seem to realize is that yeah, some things are socially constructed, but they’re socially constructed around biological facts.

From the beginning of time women had the physical disadvantage of having to carry the next generation in their bodies for nine months at a time, sometimes at the risk of their own bodily safety.  So society constructed around that and made it men’s responsibility to keep women protected because at any time a woman could get pregnant (on accident or on purpose) and go through nine months of even more vulnerability.

One could say that how we interpret a smile is socially constructed, but it’s constructed around the simple biological fact that when we’re happy, our muscles naturally lift our cheeks which cause the corners of our mouths to raise and form a pleased expression.  

Now with the invention of a million different contraceptives, we don’t need to worry about protecting pregnant women as much, because women just don’t get pregnant as much.  They have more choices and society is trying to catch up with that mentality.  Women can be virtually whatever they want to be now-a-days, but that doesn’t make the idea of women being a naturally weaker gender a “socially constructed myth”.

Especially not if you’re going to turn around in the same breath and say that women need all these different special resources that men shouldn’t have because men are stronger and shit.

nerdinessinabluebox:

thorthousand1:

Just called an anorexia help line and the girl answered and immediately hearing I was male said “you’re real funny douche” and hung up. If you dot think that’s messed up, u messed up.

ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME

Women worked outside the home before feminism

antifeminist111:

so feminists lie when they talk about how women before 1970 never worked outside the home and how  they never any legal rights. Single women (and some married women) were able to  work, sue and be sued, etc. under the Feme Sole Trader Act

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/204101/feme-sole

klokateercatlady:

vegetarianleather:

plupluru:

hominishostilis:

rootehful:

itstimeforfeminism:

calendar—girl:

girlsgetbusyzine:

writeswrongs:

cumaeansibyl:

coffeeandconlangs:

Unnecessary “fillers” in our speech. I’d rather have “like” than up-talking, though (if we had to choose one, that is). Ewwww, up-talking. Then again, a combination of the two would render me homicidal maniac.


Like, did you ever notice? That, like, the speech patterns people, like, think are stupid?  Are, like, commonly associated with, like, women?
And, like, there’s this thing? Where, like, women aren’t supposed to be, like, assertive? So they, like, qualify their speech? Because, like, we’re not supposed to, like, stand by our opinions?

1) humiliate women so they don’t feel qualified to speak authoritatively about anything
2) humiliate women for speaking in such a way that reflects how you treat her
3) laugh, you are superior because you don’t use words like “like.”  It isn’t as if being a huge stupid asshole has ever made you worse than a woman who speaks with verbal tics.  

The nail. It is hit on the head.


Pick only the female ad to share on social media. Go wild about demeaning women or something. Totally ignore the male version.

Good job.

Tumblr tho

I’ll have you know that, once again, A WOMAN wrote about how women use unnecessary fillers and “stupid” speech patterns way more often than men. Robin Lakoff, who also said women can’t be comedians by nature because of the common habit of using tag questions, said fillers and useless overpoliteness. A woman. It’s not always “men’s fault”. Also, I know a fuckton of girls that reinforce this stereotype every time they open their stupid mouths, including myself.

I say like a lot :( it’s just a habit I picked up over the years sorry for being a terrible person

I was reblogging it for the epic smackdown *hugs* I don’t agree with the whole: saying ‘like’ makes ya stupid or bad, though. 

klokateercatlady:

vegetarianleather:

plupluru:

hominishostilis:

rootehful:

itstimeforfeminism:

calendar—girl:

girlsgetbusyzine:

writeswrongs:

cumaeansibyl:

coffeeandconlangs:

Unnecessary “fillers” in our speech. I’d rather have “like” than up-talking, though (if we had to choose one, that is). Ewwww, up-talking. Then again, a combination of the two would render me homicidal maniac.

Like, did you ever notice? That, like, the speech patterns people, like, think are stupid?  Are, like, commonly associated with, like, women?

And, like, there’s this thing? Where, like, women aren’t supposed to be, like, assertive? So they, like, qualify their speech? Because, like, we’re not supposed to, like, stand by our opinions?

1) humiliate women so they don’t feel qualified to speak authoritatively about anything

2) humiliate women for speaking in such a way that reflects how you treat her

3) laugh, you are superior because you don’t use words like “like.”  It isn’t as if being a huge stupid asshole has ever made you worse than a woman who speaks with verbal tics.  

The nail. It is hit on the head.

Pick only the female ad to share on social media. Go wild about demeaning women or something. Totally ignore the male version.

image

Good job.

Tumblr tho

I’ll have you know that, once again, A WOMAN wrote about how women use unnecessary fillers and “stupid” speech patterns way more often than men. Robin Lakoff, who also said women can’t be comedians by nature because of the common habit of using tag questions, said fillers and useless overpoliteness. A woman. It’s not always “men’s fault”. Also, I know a fuckton of girls that reinforce this stereotype every time they open their stupid mouths, including myself.

I say like a lot :( it’s just a habit I picked up over the years sorry for being a terrible person

I was reblogging it for the epic smackdown *hugs* I don’t agree with the whole: saying ‘like’ makes ya stupid or bad, though. 

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

samaelcarver:

archmasterjazzy:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

>”Do straight people do anything besides have babies and oppress minorities?”

>Minorities have straight people within the collective group 

>People that are not straight can have babies 

Congrats you’re a shit head 

Next to straight people having sex is rape and being in a relationship with the opposite sex is Stockholm Syndrome.. 

That one is actually my personal favorite. Because for someone who TRULY believes as such…you know they have no real grip on reality.

Of course most of these people barely go outside 

patchoulol replied to your post: One interesting thing I’ve noticed abo…

What gets me is the paradox of thinking men and women are equally strong and capable but women have it harder than men and standards should lower. It’s not that women can’t be as strong as men, it’s just that the arguments combined make no sense.

Women need more protections for abuse because men do more damage but women are just as strong as men but when men are abused it’s not as bad because men not being allowed to deal with it is ~patriarchy~ so we’re going to deal with only women because men are discouraged from seeking help that we have the monopoly on but are not going to provide while men not dealing with it is still ~patriarchy~ and their own fault even though we’re not going to help but we’re for men too by blaming them for all that women suffer…

How their head’s don’t explode I don’t know.

johnnysjetpack:

it-goes-both-ways:

One interesting thing I’ve noticed about the effect of the upsurge in feminism in recent years, is that it’s forced my naturally balanced friends to skew their behaviour.

Men who never used to hold back in any way, wouldn’t sugar coat any criticism but wasn’t mean about it either, constructive, like it should be. Now even just acknowledging biological differences in strength when it came to ability to perform physically demanding tasks they seem to think that’s not even true any more, one of the most immediately obvious, observable differences of our species and the constant barrage of feminist crap has them questioning even that.

I wonder what “feminist biology” entails.

upsurge? last i checked it was dying out

More in feminist ideas that have permeated every aspect of media and education. The man that made me realise this was a college lecturer I used to talk with years ago on the drinking nights at a friend’s, the rest of them are in their 60s now but he was the youngest besides me, only 23 at the time. He moved down south, London I think, to teach engineering at another college, he phoned at the last drinking night and when he spoke to me I mentioned my joining the army, he remembered that had been a goal of mine 12 years before but now suddenly denied that I would be naturally weaker than the men.

The denial of the sexual dimorphism of our species, that radical feminist thought is now just mainstream thought while feminism is dying outside of where most of the damage has already been done. If that makes sense.