Female, anti feminist, egalitarian.
I'm against sexism of all kinds but there are plenty of blogs whose sole focus is on women but very few even recognise that sexism does not equal Man against Woman.
This blog focuses on Misandry: The hatred, discimination or distrust of men and boys. Pointing out the representation of men in the media, deliberate misinformation/misrepresentation, the demonisation of men in our society and the imbalance this causes.
Rather than think of ourselves as in competition we should cater to everyone as needed.
If you think I'm being unfair to other women just know that I consider all sides of an argument, normally I prefer to be the fence. But for the purposes of this blog I have taken a side so apologies if this offends you.
I answer all asks privately unless otherwise requested or anonymous.

 

Disney fairy tales turn to abuse nightmares

dracofangxxx:

it-goes-both-ways:

How many Disney films centred around the princess while the prince doesn’t even merit a name. How many evil bad men does the prince fight in order to save the life of the princess at serious risk to his own. How many good men are there in these films besides her prince?

And now, they’re seriously saying that after they have risked their very existence to save the person they love, they’re all going to beat the shit out of them. After all the crap the Disney princes get for merely being the object of a female character’s affection this shouldn’t come as a shock but it is a disgusting new low.

The message from everywhere is even if a man endures tremendous suffering with no thanks and no expectation of reward, risks his very life to save yours or just to make you more comfortable, he is a monster.

That’s just the point, though. 

Listen, I’ve been in abusive relationships. The hardest part when you know you need to jump ship is thinking, ‘well he’s done x for me, he’s done y, he’s sweet like this, he brought me roses the other day, i can ignore the rest of it’. You make excuses. You feel like you owe them.

The whole point, I think, is that it doesn’t matter how much good these guys did, or how much they went through at the start. If your partner starts abusing you, it isn’t your job to fix them, to stay, to deal with it. It doesn’t matter if they cook you dinner every night, if they’re beating you every other day or so, that doesn’t condone a healthy relationship. You need to get out.

I do think portraying ALL of the princes as abusive is a folly, if that’s what the creator was going for, but I think the idea is very just: abuse is abuse, regardless of how good they’re treating you, or have treated you in the past. It is not your job to fix somebody else who is damaging you. At what point did the bad guys the princes slay turn into the bad guys themselves?

I advocate equality for both sexes and see female x male domestic violence issues as a very serious, very erased issue. But it is still important to bring visibility to male x female or otherwise, like this project aims to do. 

Abusers are humans, too. They have very real emotions. They almost always do love the person they abuse, sometimes intensely. They can do great things, be sweet, etc.  And they do deserve love. But that’s just it. We can’t demonize abusers like they’re 100% terrible, because that’s when we stop realizing what equates to an actual abusive relationship- we make excuses, we try to forgive too many times in a row. And then people are hurt and trapped. I think you, and many others, are approaching this through the lense that it’s blaming all men, all relationships, etc. and relying too much on your kneejerk emotions here. This is a very real and very deep problem that many men and women face: When is it time to realize my relationship has gone south?

I wasn’t meaning ingratitude, I meant that every action by these men has been seen as oppressive to women, saving women’s lives means you want to beat up women according to Anita Sarkeesian, they will see negativity in absolutely everything.

My point was that in these films the prince is usually the only good man in the princess’s life, there are men out to kill her, marry her for power,l lusting after her etc. And even he is an evil monster because all men are abusive in some way. Every man is out to abuse you. Never trust a man, even if he has well and truly proved his worth and never given any indication that he’d do all of this to rape and batter you the first chance he gets. We know it can be difficult to recognise abuse. We know there are men who are abusive. We’ve heard it. All our lives we’ve heard that message. It’s all we ever hear.

We never see the reverse in such a way, we never get people trying to taint our childhood with this shit, until they actually start to give a toss and stop poisoning every single male character and painting even the worst of women as victims of men, until they stop being so one sided I will protest every single one of these campaigns. They’re all the bloody same. Once in a blue moon we’ll get one abused man with a dozen or so women and that is like a single droplet of water to a starving tree.

patrickkellyf3 said: Rallying people into Twitter wars honestly isn’t the best way to approach things.

Yeah but it’s quite fun, since it had been taken over by feminists saying we’re all traitors and traditionalists it was fun watching them demonstrate the reasons we gave as they were trying to prove us wrong. Or rather, declaring us wrong then running away.

Disney fairy tales turn to abuse nightmares

How many Disney films centred around the princess while the prince doesn’t even merit a name. How many evil bad men does the prince fight in order to save the life of the princess at serious risk to his own. How many good men are there in these films besides her prince?

And now, they’re seriously saying that after they have risked their very existence to save the person they love, they’re all going to beat the shit out of them. After all the crap the Disney princes get for merely being the object of a female character’s affection this shouldn’t come as a shock but it is a disgusting new low.

The message from everywhere is even if a man endures tremendous suffering with no thanks and no expectation of reward, risks his very life to save yours or just to make you more comfortable, he is a monster.

themundanematt:

4chan explains the true meaning of “Tits or GTFO!”

Currently on a bit of a twitter war on the WomenAgainstFeminism tag, anyone care to join me?

just-smith:

anti-feminism-pro-equality:

I love this picture to death because its the ultimate proof of equality. We make fun of EVERYONE not just men not just women!

It’s not really though, is it? If you mock women for something our society says men should do, and men for something society says that women should do, you’re just enforcing gender roles onto both groups. That’s not progressive or different, that’s something that almost every bit of sexism does. Doing them both at once is no better than different people doing them separately; you still perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
Equality would be mocking men and women for the exact same things, because you acknowledge that we are all human and our gender doesn’t decide what we can and can’t do. There’s a big difference between equal treatment and an equal level of treatment. Forcing women to stay in the home and forcing men to support their whole family alone sucks for both groups, so it’s a similar level of negative treatment, but you’re a fool if you’d call that equality.

When I cook:

No subject should be out of bounds for humour, everyone is equally a target, whether or not it’s accurate. The fact that it is a joke is a sign that things have changed (from that very brief period where women were mainly at home, just upper and middle classes at that), if it was just stating fact it wouldn’t be funny.

just-smith:

anti-feminism-pro-equality:

I love this picture to death because its the ultimate proof of equality. We make fun of EVERYONE not just men not just women!

It’s not really though, is it? If you mock women for something our society says men should do, and men for something society says that women should do, you’re just enforcing gender roles onto both groups. That’s not progressive or different, that’s something that almost every bit of sexism does. Doing them both at once is no better than different people doing them separately; you still perpetuate harmful stereotypes.

Equality would be mocking men and women for the exact same things, because you acknowledge that we are all human and our gender doesn’t decide what we can and can’t do. There’s a big difference between equal treatment and an equal level of treatment. Forcing women to stay in the home and forcing men to support their whole family alone sucks for both groups, so it’s a similar level of negative treatment, but you’re a fool if you’d call that equality.

When I cook:

http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_leefoavQhA1qbtchoo1_400.gif

No subject should be out of bounds for humour, everyone is equally a target, whether or not it’s accurate. The fact that it is a joke is a sign that things have changed (from that very brief period where women were mainly at home, just upper and middle classes at that), if it was just stating fact it wouldn’t be funny.

Anonymous asked
Hey, what are you thoughts about fictional works. Alot of social justice say that if you enjoy a certain fetish/trope in a fictional stuff, it's just a bad, whether or whether not you approve of it in real life. I find it fucking annoying but idk you think they have any grounds?

thespectacularspider-girl:

rossalinrose:

whydoikeepgettingdeleted:

thespectacularspider-girl:

I think that it is fine to a fairly large degree.  Rape fantasies are common, for example, and they don’t actually cause rape.

Rossalinrose needs to read this she thinks people with rape fantasy are sick.

yeah bc they are??? if u have seriously thought about raping a child you are sick

Rape fantasies are not the same thing as pedophilia.  To try to equate the two as being one and the same is dishonest.

You’ll also be surprised to know that 9 studies over 30 years (the last one being 2008) showed that, on average, 40% of women have rape fantasies.  The estimated minimum being 31%, the highest estimate being 57%.

In 2009 62% of 355 college women said that they’ve had fantasies involving them “being forcefully taken by a man”.  When the term “rape” was actually used, that dropped to 32% of them.

Rape fantasies are just fantasies.  They aren’t harmful.  And this is coming from a rape survivor.

This reminds me of the tons of fics involving rape of one of the characters, out of curiosity I checked their tumblrs they linked to and found that they’re more often than not written by feminists. It’s like they obsess over it constantly and feel disgusted by their fantasies so they blame all of society. The ones I’ve read by feminists who linked to their tumblrs describe the event in graphic detail, right down to the sounds and sensations, it’s downright erotic, while their reaction is complete and utter devastation, the most extreme PTSD you can imagine, it’s a strange contrast. No matter which character it’s about, it’ll be practically the same. The ones that are not openly feminist vary from following this pattern to being handled a lot more realistically, much more in character.

From the women I’ve met with rape fantasies they also seem to be the most terrified and paranoid, probably something to do with how much they think about it.

Wasn’t there a thing about women hiring men to “rape” them?

thatalbanianguy:

it-goes-both-ways:

hellwasabor:

it-goes-both-ways:

Judge Judy admits to NOT being a feminist - Katie Couric gets nervous - cameron dylann

This explains a lot. I like the “too stupid to know I was being held back”.

Her default response was to just regurgitate the definition (like so many others).
She sits there and all I can here her say is “don’t question it Judy just embrace it”

Is it just me or did the audience gasp when she said feminism didn’t get her where she is?

I wouldn’t be surprised at all. She got herself where she is. Just like Marie Curie. Just like the multitude of women before and after feminism. In fact, IIRC, we had Queens WAY before feminism. Funny that.

You’d never know it from the way they seem to be gradually erasing or minimising everything they’ve done and reducing them to oppressed victims. I used to see a lot of programmes on great figures from history, male and female alike, and now it’s usually evil men of history and maybe some on women concentrating more on how they suffered at the hands of men or how men kept them down or tried to.

Just looking on google trends trends to see if my suspicion is correct, mentions of women from history compared to male tyrants, the most well known queens and female figures like Marie Curie and Boudica and sure enough, over the past few years they have almost completely dropped off the radar, along with great male figures. Whereas mentions of Hitler and other tyrants remain high.

This could also be explained by people’s propensity for righteous anger, hysteria and any kind of negativity.

hellwasabor:

it-goes-both-ways:

Judge Judy admits to NOT being a feminist - Katie Couric gets nervous - cameron dylann

This explains a lot. I like the “too stupid to know I was being held back”.

Her default response was to just regurgitate the definition (like so many others).
She sits there and all I can here her say is “don’t question it Judy just embrace it”

Is it just me or did the audience gasp when she said feminism didn’t get her where she is?

Judge Judy admits to NOT being a feminist - Katie Couric gets nervous - cameron dylann

This explains a lot. I like the “too stupid to know I was being held back”.

Sexual assault in America: Do we know the true numbers? American Enterprise Institute

Not surprisingly the 1 in 5 figure was bullshit but worst of all, the respondents didn’t even get to decide whether or not they were raped, that was decided for them. From the small number of respondents that, ironically, had no choice in even deciding whether or not they were raped, they came up with a figure of 1.3 million women and 12.7 million women and men were sexually assaulted. The most reliable crime survey shows only 188,380 rape/sexual assaults of both men and women.

ilikechildren—fried:

anonguy11:

ilikechildren—fried:

thederidiabletower:

ilikechildren—fried:

kodoris:

SHOTS FIRED

i’m sure this is full of bullshit but I don’t know bumfuck about this particular game and I don’t feel like typing a whole paragraph at the moment so imma let one of my followers point out the discrepancies and move on

I’m gonna start with “Their game doesn’t use Mo-Cap”

yes, yes that’s good…


Plus Ubi is doing four or five times the work (Just the Wii U for Nintendo vs. PS3/4 XBONE/360 and PC for Ubi). The scope is vastly different too I’m wagering. Ubi is laying the ground work for all future Ass Creed games.
Ass Creed 1 didn’t really have female characters outside of the tech girl and bunch of support characters.
Also, who’s programming Unity? Spoilers: it’s Ubisoft. Who would know the most about their workload? Spoilers: Not some douche on twitter.
Also, you’d always play Arno in co-op anyways, so they cut the characters for time since you’d only see everyone else playing as her. And they cut Multiplayer as well. If they say they don’t have the time, I’m incline to believe them.
Mainly because I’m not an idiot on social media who thinks game programming is swoosh and swish like a fucking Harry Potter spell and is actually time consuming.

ilikechildren—fried:

anonguy11:

ilikechildren—fried:

thederidiabletower:

ilikechildren—fried:

kodoris:

SHOTS FIRED

i’m sure this is full of bullshit but I don’t know bumfuck about this particular game and I don’t feel like typing a whole paragraph at the moment so imma let one of my followers point out the discrepancies and move on

I’m gonna start with “Their game doesn’t use Mo-Cap”

yes, yes that’s good…

Plus Ubi is doing four or five times the work (Just the Wii U for Nintendo vs. PS3/4 XBONE/360 and PC for Ubi). The scope is vastly different too I’m wagering. Ubi is laying the ground work for all future Ass Creed games.

Ass Creed 1 didn’t really have female characters outside of the tech girl and bunch of support characters.

Also, who’s programming Unity? Spoilers: it’s Ubisoft. Who would know the most about their workload? Spoilers: Not some douche on twitter.

Also, you’d always play Arno in co-op anyways, so they cut the characters for time since you’d only see everyone else playing as her. And they cut Multiplayer as well. If they say they don’t have the time, I’m incline to believe them.

Mainly because I’m not an idiot on social media who thinks game programming is swoosh and swish like a fucking Harry Potter spell and is actually time consuming.

jimfear138:

sosungalittleclodofclay:

jimfear138:

creepy-e:

gayobamafanfiction:

blorgblorgblorg:

maxofs2d:

Hahaha

"Men’s Rights" activist and self-proclaimed philosopher Stefan Molyneux pretends to be a woman posting a positive comment on his own video “debunking” Frozen but completely fails at account switching

amazing

Men do things like this a lot

So do feminists:

dailycaller.com/2013/10/12/wyoming-hate-f-hoaxer-adds-to-checkered-criminal-past-now-attends-law-school/

Meet Meghan Lanker-Simons, who left a fake message from an alt account saying “I want to hatefuck Meg Lanker Simons so hard. That chick runs her liberal mouth all the time and doesn’t care who knows it. I think its so hot and makes me angry. One night with me and shes gonna be a good Republican bitch." She interpreted it as a rape threat, leading to a feminist rally on campus and a police investigation before investigators found the comment came from her computer while it was in her posession. Muh rape culture!

Surprise. She’s also a tumblr user    http://cognitivedissonance.tumblr.com/

Also, are we dead certain that Stefan runs that YouTube channel? He could be recording the videos and passing them off to someone else who uploads them. I’m not saying that’s a sure bet, but Stefan seems far more intelligent than to try and pretend to be someone else commenting on his video aggrandizing his own ego. If there’s one thing that YouTubing has taught me, it’s that being a one-person show (meaning one person writing, filming, editing, etc., basically doing every step of the video production process by yourself) it takes a while to go from video to video unless that’s literally all you do. Stefan’s channel puts out several videos a day, some of them upwards of two hours long. The time it takes to record the videos is quite a while, not even taking into account editing and script writing. And as well thought out and well spoken as his videos are, he’s definitely working from a script. This leads me to believe that Stefan has some kind of a team working with him for the YouTube channel, even if it’s just one person. So it’s very possible that the other person posted that comment under the Stefan Molyneux channel name, purposely or not, as their particular addition to the proceedings in the comment forum.

There’s also the matter of the description. Usually when someone is running a personal YouTube channel, they speak in “I’s” and “My’s” so far as their description goes. So, if this were a channel run solely by Stefan, it would probably read something like, “I unpack the truth behind the Walt Disney animated movie Frozen,” rather than him apparently speaking in the third person. That just seems off to me, and really leads me to think that there’s a team uploading these videos, rather than simply Stefan alone. 

Once again, I’m not saying that’s the way it happened, just that it’s a possibility. I’ve heard Stefan speak and watched his videos. He’s nowhere near dumb enough to think that shit would fly unnoticed. If he was gonna pull this kinda crap, he’d at least have a sock account that had been up for years, probably with some random videos on it to make it look more legit, not post it under his own personal channel. 

It just smells off to me, is all. Though it’s entirely possible that he did fuck up and try to pull some crap like that. I don’t know Stefan, so I can’t exactly ask him myself. This just seems…too stupid for someone as obviously intelligent as he is. 

actually going to the video, apparently the option for adding a google+ comment to the youtube video (molyneux does this a lot for positive comments) started publishing as the person that moved it, not as the person that made it.

Oh. Goddammit Google…

Glad someone beat me to it.

I think one of mine even made it in, just send him a good comment and it’ll show up.

In some videos you can hear his team manning the phones and running things in the background as they read out questions for him to answer. Freedomainradio started as just him so when google changed, it reverted to his name as the original account holder.